The Health and Work Service: confusion may reign

By on

The British Medical Association believes that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) description of the new Health and Work Service (HWS) as providing ‘occupational health advice and support’ is unhelpful and confusing. Occupational health is a broad specialty with an emphasis on protecting and promoting the health of people at work, working with colleagues including safety managers. The mainly telephone-delivered HWS offers case management of ill employees, which is only one of many functions of a comprehensive occupational health service (OHS); prevention and promotion being more critical success factors in matters of health and safety.

The Frost/Black review of sickness absence recommended a new Independent Assessment Service (IAS), and the DWP has not created value by changing the name to one less fitting (HWS). By definition ‘health’ is the absence of illness, yet users of the HWS must be ill; there is no preventive element. Confusion risks damaging existing OH provision and diluting support to workers by replacing advice and support from providers who understand intimately the hazards and jobs in workplaces. The economic climate is already pressurising employers to cut costs and OH is an easy target. Some employers are already questioning the need for their current provision of genuine on-site OHS because of DWP’s confusing communications about the mainly telephone-based HWS.

Dumbing down occupational health through messages that it is only about getting ill people back to work won’t help when recruitment into occupational medicine training posts is at an all time low; such messages risk accelerating the decline of the speciality. 

On a more positive note, HML – who won the contract to provide the HWS – have advertised for ‘healthcare professionals responsible for carrying out bio-psychosocial assessments, looking for both occupational health professionals, and healthcare professionals from other disciplines’. This is in the spirit of the IAS proposed by Black and Frost. It recognises the true nature of the assessments and the fact that the service should be provided by a range of health professionals with diverse and relevant skills.

Dr Paul J Nicholson is chair of the British Medical Association’s Occupational Medicine Committee


Lawrence Waterman Chairman of British Safety Council-editedSMLL.jpg

Charity work: inspiring and professional

By Lawrence Waterman OBE's first column for Safety Management on 09 May 2018

It is always pleasing when expectations are exceeded, when people are surprised because their experience is so much better than what they were expecting. Here at the British Safety Council we have several ways of doing that, often employed in a combination that brings a smile to the lips.


Don’t take safety for granted

By Mike Robinson, chief executive of the British Safety Council on 11 May 2018

The principle of continual improvement has long been accepted as a key component of effective health and safety management, and the plan-do-check-act cycle is widely recognised throughout the world.

Future risk iStock-SMLL credit-zoranm.jpg

Good work for all, today and tomorrow

By Matthew Holder, head of campaigns at the British Safety Council, introduces a new report on future risk on 23 February 2018

The British Safety Council has produced a new literature review on how changes to the way we work are likely to change risks to our health, safety and wellbeing in the future.