Opinion

A new legal duty for large employers to support mental health at work would help people to thrive

By on

From a human perspective, it has always made sense for employers to create mentally healthy workplaces. It also makes sense from an economic perspective for employers to invest in the mental health of their workforce, perhaps now more than ever.


Research from Deloitte shows that the cost to employers of poor mental health has increased from £45 billion in 2019 to up to £56 billion in 2020-21. In addition, 40 per cent of all turnover costs are attributable to mental health issues.

Stress is a risk factor for poor mental health, and this includes self-reported work-related stress. Recent Labour Force Survey figures cited by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found 914,000 cases of work-related stress, depression or anxiety in 2021/22 (a prevalence rate of 2,750 cases per 100,000 workers).

The Mental Health Foundation wants the UK to introduce a minimum of two mental health days for every public sector worker. Photograph: iStock

Of these, 372,000 were new cases (1,120 per 100,000 workers). The 2021/22 rate is higher than the 2018/19 pre-coronavirus levels, although the report notes that the rate of self-reported work-related stress, depression or anxiety had shown signs of increasing prior to the coronavirus pandemic.

It is important to work preventively, to identify and address the causes of work-related stress as part of creating a mentally healthy workplace.

However, while many businesses want to support employee mental health, they struggle to do so effectively. It is important for government and the Health and Safety Executive to ensure that employers treat physical and psychological hazards in the workplace equally and help employers to recognise and address psychological hazards in the workplace under existing legislation.

The Mental Health Foundation would also like governments across the UK to introduce a minimum of two mental health days for every public sector worker.

The Foundation is also supportive of calls for the UK government to more actively help businesses with more than 250 employees reduce instances of work-related poor mental health and create working environments where people can thrive. A simple and clear legislative framework has been proposed to promote meaningful employer engagement, transparency and education in workplaces, which asks companies to annually:

1. Assess, Prevent, Manage, Action: through a workforce mental health risk assessment and management strategy underpinned by annual surveys, with results shared back to employees – with actions made clear

2. Educate: by providing mental health awareness and training for entire workforce

3. Support: offering appropriate mental health support to employees and contractors.
The above would form an annual CEO commitment stating the company’s leadership commitment, driven by a member of senior management as sponsor and supported by a wider team, who are accountable for these efforts.

Lucy Thorpe is Head of policy at Mental Health Foundation

For more information see:
mentalhealth.org.uk

OPINION


Hannah Frost

Common safety pitfalls in manufacturing – what can we learn from recent prosecutions?

By Hannah Frost, Pinsent Masons on 16 March 2023

Statistics from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) show that the manufacturing sector directly employs approximately 2.5 million people and accounts for 16 per cent of reported injuries to employees in the UK.



David Greenberg

Why the UK’s noise regulations fall short in protecting workers’ hearing

By Dr David Greenberg, EAVE on 15 March 2023

Although UK employers have long had a duty to prevent their employees suffering noise-induced hearing loss, a huge swath of workers continue to be exposed to loud noise at work, due to a combination of cultural, technological and regulatory failures.



Samantha Peters (2)

In praise of nothing

By Dr Samantha Peters, Being Well Together on 08 March 2023

I’ve a colleague working in social care. Part of their week is spent at a community centre. It’s a challenging role. There’s no time for idleness. Nor would anyone advocate it, I imagine. But what about fallow? Rest. Respite. A simple lull in the day?