Features

Beating the bullies

By on

Bullying can have a detrimental effect on an employee’s mental wellbeing, but there are ways of preventing it – such as creating a culture that prioritises staff wellbeing over performance.


Unjustified criticism, gossip, name-calling, false allegations, being ignored and belittled are all actions that embody the experience of bullying. When people at work experience these behaviours regularly over a sustained period of time, they become victims of bullying. This experience is deeply unpleasant for people and is often made worse when there is no clear path to resolution.

‘Report the behaviour’ is one suggestion made to bullying victims; however, this option is beset with difficulties: the organisation may not listen, the perpetrator may retaliate, the bullying may be difficult to prove, and there may not be support available. It is little wonder that people more often try to avoid the bully, rather than report it to management.

Organisations, teams and individuals all have a role to play in establishing working environments that do not tolerate bullying. Photograph: iStockOrganisations, teams and individuals all have a role to play in establishing working environments that do not tolerate bullying. Photograph: iStock

So what kind of steps can organisations and managers take to prevent workplace bullying?

Bullying is often viewed as an interpersonal problem (“If that person performed better, I wouldn’t need to bully them!”, “We just need to weed out the bad apples and then everything will be fine”). However, organisations, teams and individuals all have a role to play in establishing working environments that do not tolerate bullying.

The organisational response

Is your organisation a place that rewards bullying behaviour? Would you trust your HR department to act fairly if you reported it? If you work in a place where managers use intimidation to rid themselves of under-performing staff, where ruthlessness is rewarded, or where HR tend to side with the most powerful people in the room, your organisation is likely fostering conditions that encourage bullying.

Quickly changing organisational climates and cultures is difficult. However, evidence suggests that bullying occurs less in organisations that prioritise employee wellbeing over performance, that emphasise bullying is not tolerated, that have fair and trusted procedures for resolving conflict, and that minimise stressful job characteristics (such as role conflict and role ambiguity).

For new and growing organisations, developing a bullying policy is a good place to start. To be effective, policies should clarify what is meant by bullying and other unacceptable behaviours, encourage informal resolution, and clearly specify the formal resolution process. Policies also need to be clearly communicated to every member of the organisation and new starters should be made aware of the policy during induction procedures.

The team response

Social support has been consistently shown to protect people from the worst effects of bullying, as the benefits of social support are more fully realised when people are in distress. This is because supportive colleagues can provide consolation, a listening ear, and help make more informed decisions on how to resolve issues.

Methods of encouraging social support within a team are likely to vary across organisational contexts and across teams of different sizes. However, research suggests that two practices are required for compassion to abound in workplaces. First, high quality connections can be established by recognising people’s contributions, celebrating successes and personal events (for example, birthdays, weddings), by making joint decisions, by offering help, and by immediately addressing problems or misunderstandings.

Second, although work should be the primary function of a workplace, by sharing and discussing non-work information people can signal to others why they might be having an ‘off-day’. These practices humanise the workplace and may promote empathetic concern from colleagues, who may be able to provide support and advice.

In addition, expressing gratitude has been found to decrease workplace mistreatment.

The individual response

As individuals, we may ask what we can do to stop bullying at work when we see it happening to others or ourselves.

The best methods of intervening vary across situations, but bullying can occur when small issues escalate into entrenched conflict, which means that responding effectively when conflict initially rears its head may be the difference between quick resolution and long-term dispute.

Evidence suggests that bullying occurs less in organisations where people seek to find mutually beneficial solutions to conflict. Therefore, training all employees at all levels of the business to be ‘conflict competent’ in a way that enables them to resolve disagreements informally through conversation is seen as an effective approach.

However, even the most diplomatic people will struggle to resolve disagreements when they work in a toxic organisational environment, as it may not be within the organisation’s or perpetrator’s interests to address the core issue.

For example, if an individual complains about their overbearing workload, it may not suit the manager or organisation to find a way of reallocating some of that workload. For these reasons, senior leadership and managers should think carefully about the ways that they respond when employees try to raise issues.

Initiatives that encourage employee voice, such as the ‘Freedom to Speak Up Guardians’ (trained individuals who support workers in organisations like the NHS to speak up about anything that is affecting their working lives), open door policies, and managers who actively solicit employee concerns are ways of demonstrating that employee concerns will be listened to and appreciated.

By acting on employee concerns, organisations may be able to prevent a host of problems – not just bullying – and such actions may prevent employees feeling that they have to blow the whistle in a very public manner.

These are just some of the ways managers can act to prevent bullying. To further support managers tasked with actively preventing bullying, I have been working with colleagues to develop training that aids anti-bullying efforts. If you would like to hear more about this, please email me at [email protected]

We can provide this training free of charge, but we would like to evaluate its effectiveness.

Dr Sam Farley is an associate professor in organizational psychology researching workplace bullying and mistreatment. Contact him here 

Workplace conflict research – could you help?

Along with colleagues at Acas, researchers from the universities of Huddersfield, Leeds and Loughborough have developed a conflict de-escalation workshop they wish to pilot in some large organisations to assess if it is successful in helping people to resolve conflicts informally, reduce the number of formal grievances and (hopefully) reduce bullying and harassment. 

The aim is to increase employees’ ability to successfully navigate conflicts, so that the small things that bother them don’t escalate into protracted, long-term conflicts which cause ill-health, absenteeism, and expensive and stressful formal grievance procedures. The researchers want to work with organisations to think about the procedures they can adopt to make informal conflict resolution easier for employees. 

The workshop would be delivered free of charge and run for three to four hours. The researchers would also like to conduct some research among the participating organisations (for example, surveys, interviews), to examine whether participating in the workshop actually increases employees’ abilities to resolve conflicts.

If you are interested, please email Dr Sam Farley with the word ‘workshop’ in the subject line: [email protected]

Cyberbullying at work – distribute the survey

Researchers from the universities of Leeds, Loughborough and Northumbria are recruiting organisations to take part in a short confidential survey on cyberbullying and bullying at work.

The survey aims to identify:

  • The prevalence of cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying
  • How these forms of bullying affect employee mental health
  • The factors most responsible for these different forms of bullying.

Participating organisations will be asked to distribute a 10-minute survey to employees twice over a six-month period. Organisations will be able to review the survey before distributing it to staff.

Participating organisations will receive a tailored feedback report on:

  • The likely prevalence of bullying in the organisation
    The causes and impact of bullying within the organisation
    An evidence-based review of existing strategies for managing face-to-face and cyberbullying.

If preferred, the researchers will also feedback the information in presentation form.

An organisation’s details will remain confidential and anonymous at all times.

If you are interested, please email Dr Sam Farley with the words ‘survey study’ in the subject line: [email protected]

FEATURES


Evacuation Chair In Use 500 Wide Min

Emergency evacuation for people with mobility issues: why we must do better

By Gerard Wallace, Evac+Chair International on 01 August 2023

With research revealing poor understanding among many businesses of their duty to have arrangements in place to safely evacuate mobility-impaired people, it’s time for the government to educate building owners about their obligations and mandate the provision of evacuation equipment, to ensure a safe evacuation for everyone.



MATTHE~2 Min

Establishing a company culture of safety

By Driving for Better Business on 01 November 2024

Collision prevention takes growth mindsets, psychological safety and a ‘just’ culture, delegates at the recent National Highways ‘Driving Change’ conference heard.



Istock 1163141143 Credit Smederevac 500 Wide Min

Driver fatigue: always minimise the risk

By Driving for Better Business on 01 November 2024

Research shows that driver fatigue may be a contributory factor in up to 20 per cent of road incidents, and up to one-quarter of fatal and serious incidents.