The conclusion of the UK Prime Minister’s statement to Parliament on the government’s plan for ‘living with Covid’, in which he set out the rationale for lifting all legal restrictions in England, bears repeating, I think.
Opinion
Newfound Covid ‘freedoms’ are a privilege and should be handled with care
By
on 07 March 2022
Speaking to MPs on 21 February, Boris Johnson said: “We don’t need laws to compel people to be considerate to others. We can rely on that sense of responsibility to others, providing practical advice in the knowledge that people will follow it to avoid infecting loved ones and others.
“So let us learn to live with this virus and continue protecting ourselves and others without restricting our freedoms.”
This spirit and the sense of personal responsibility the Prime Minister is calling on here is hard to argue with.
Mike Robinson: "It is in nobody’s interests to see large numbers of Covid outbreaks in workplaces, which will ultimately curb everyone’s freedoms."
Indeed, his point about people being given practical advice and deciding for themselves underpins much of our public health policy.
Even health and safety best practice relies on people using their own judgment, particularly when it comes to personal risk, and the direction of travel in the sector is that individuals should be increasingly trusted to assess risk for themselves and able to make their own decisions, having been given the best available information. Safety should be seen as a business ‘outcome’, not just another process.
Now that most people are vaccinated and Omicron has proven to be milder than first feared, the government has decided much of the ‘architecture’ around our decision-making can be removed.
Taking any scaffold or support away is never easy. Think of any building or extension work or learning to ride a bike using stabilisers. That’s why some elements in this Covid plan – like day one Statutory Sick Pay and Employment Support Allowance – will remain in place at least temporarily, while others have already been taken away.
Two that have gone will impact on employers and their staff. On the one hand, routine contact tracing has ended, so contacts will no longer be required to self-isolate or advised to take daily tests. On the other, people will no longer be legally obliged to tell their employer when they are themselves required to self-isolate.
Taking away both leaves it up to employers and their staff to work out how best to act, at least until the government replaces the current ‘Working safely during coronavirus (Covid-19)’ guidance, which it will on 1 April.
That’s why I have said that it’s vital we all remain cautious, and I called on employers to continue to allow their staff to take time off when they test positive or have Covid symptoms.
No one wants to see infections rise again or spiral out of control. It is in nobody’s interests to see large numbers of Covid outbreaks in workplaces, which will ultimately curb everyone’s freedoms, as well as harm productivity and the economy.
Any good risk assessment is kept under review and updated regularly. I think the government should do the same with its plan for ‘living with Covid’.
Just as, at the end of last year, a ‘Plan B’ was required to tackle Omicron, it would be sensible for us all to consider our newfound ‘freedoms’ as a privilege, not a right, which may have to be given up should the circumstances change again.
I agree with the Prime Minister that we shouldn’t have to rely on laws to guide responsible behaviour, but as we have all seen only too clearly in the past two years, sometimes it is necessary to curb our own freedoms a little for the good of the whole.
Mike Robinson FCA is Chief executive of the British Safety Council
OPINION
In these times, how can we be safe, well and happy?
By Mike Robinson FCA on 01 July 2024
Last month, I mentioned two big moments – the General Election and the 50th anniversary of the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) on 31 July. The lack of attention given to health, safety, or even wellbeing by most political parties in their election manifestos, while not entirely unexpected, was disappointing. And it doesn’t reflect the real concerns of workers and leaders here and around the world.
It’s time to protect all leaseholders from ruinous building safety remediation costs
By The Earl of Lytton on 28 June 2024
In my previous piece for Safety Management last summer (‘A new Building Safety Remediation Scheme would hold developers and builders to account for all fire and building safety defects in homes’) I set the scene on the unfolding world of building safety remediation and described how I was attempting to change things in the interests of consumer safety. Now with a general election called, there is an opportunity to influence the policies of a new, incoming administration.
Menopause at work: government failing to grasp benefits of providing more support to women workers
By Caroline Nokes on 01 May 2023
Many employers are waking up to the realities of menopause, and the benefits of providing a supportive environment for women at work. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) research shows that 30 per cent of UK employers now have menopause policies, up from 10 per cent in 2019. But I am increasingly worried that the government has not appreciated the need to seize momentum.