Opinion

Newfound Covid ‘freedoms’ are a privilege and should be handled with care

By on

The conclusion of the UK Prime Minister’s statement to Parliament on the government’s plan for ‘living with Covid’, in which he set out the rationale for lifting all legal restrictions in England, bears repeating, I think.


Speaking to MPs on 21 February, Boris Johnson said: “We don’t need laws to compel people to be considerate to others. We can rely on that sense of responsibility to others, providing practical advice in the knowledge that people will follow it to avoid infecting loved ones and others.

“So let us learn to live with this virus and continue protecting ourselves and others without restricting our freedoms.”

This spirit and the sense of personal responsibility the Prime Minister is calling on here is hard to argue with.

Mike Robinson: "It is in nobody’s interests to see large numbers of Covid outbreaks in workplaces, which will ultimately curb everyone’s freedoms."Mike Robinson: "It is in nobody’s interests to see large numbers of Covid outbreaks in workplaces, which will ultimately curb everyone’s freedoms."

Indeed, his point about people being given practical advice and deciding for themselves underpins much of our public health policy.

Even health and safety best practice relies on people using their own judgment, particularly when it comes to personal risk, and the direction of travel in the sector is that individuals should be increasingly trusted to assess risk for themselves and able to make their own decisions, having been given the best available information. Safety should be seen as a business ‘outcome’, not just another process.

Now that most people are vaccinated and Omicron has proven to be milder than first feared, the government has decided much of the ‘architecture’ around our decision-making can be removed.

Taking any scaffold or support away is never easy. Think of any building or extension work or learning to ride a bike using stabilisers. That’s why some elements in this Covid plan – like day one Statutory Sick Pay and Employment Support Allowance – will remain in place at least temporarily, while others have already been taken away.

Two that have gone will impact on employers and their staff. On the one hand, routine contact tracing has ended, so contacts will no longer be required to self-isolate or advised to take daily tests. On the other, people will no longer be legally obliged to tell their employer when they are themselves required to self-isolate.

Taking away both leaves it up to employers and their staff to work out how best to act, at least until the government replaces the current ‘Working safely during coronavirus (Covid-19)’ guidance, which it will on 1 April.

That’s why I have said that it’s vital we all remain cautious, and I called on employers to continue to allow their staff to take time off when they test positive or have Covid symptoms.

No one wants to see infections rise again or spiral out of control. It is in nobody’s interests to see large numbers of Covid outbreaks in workplaces, which will ultimately curb everyone’s freedoms, as well as harm productivity and the economy.

Any good risk assessment is kept under review and updated regularly. I think the government should do the same with its plan for ‘living with Covid’.

Just as, at the end of last year, a ‘Plan B’ was required to tackle Omicron, it would be sensible for us all to consider our newfound ‘freedoms’ as a privilege, not a right, which may have to be given up should the circumstances change again.

I agree with the Prime Minister that we shouldn’t have to rely on laws to guide responsible behaviour, but as we have all seen only too clearly in the past two years, sometimes it is necessary to curb our own freedoms a little for the good of the whole.

Mike Robinson FCA is Chief executive of the British Safety Council

OPINION


Mike Robinson 3 Med

Navigating a changing world

By Mike Robinson FCA, British Safety Council on 03 March 2025

Human history has hung on a timeline of change and every generation has been asked to answer the same call, to adapt and evolve. From the printing press to the PC, change has continuously re-defined both the work we do and how we do it. Where the future differs from the past is the pace at which change will impact society.



Workers in Hearing Protection iStock miniseries

Noise-induced hearing loss: time to make it personal?

By Neal Hill, UKHCA on 28 February 2025

This year, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) celebrated its 50th anniversary, a milestone in its long-standing mission to protect lives and improve workplace safety. 2025 is also the 20th anniversary of the Control of Noise at Work Regulations (2005). It’s also now a year since I wrote an opinion piece for Safety Management arguing that we need to harness new technology to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).¹ So, what has happened in the meantime?



Older Female Worker iStock VioletaStoimenova

An age diverse workforce – some key health and safety considerations

By Liam Jagger, Pinsent Masons on 06 February 2025

As the proportion of older people in the workforce grows, it is vital employers take steps to assess and mitigate risks to the health, safety and wellbeing of older employees, such as a possible higher chance of musculoskeletal injury.