Opinion

Can we see the wood for the trees?

By on

Ten years ago, the United Nations’ General Assembly decreed that 20 March would be ‘International Day of Happiness’. You may have seen that Finland came out top as the happiest country in the world, for the sixth year running, in the World Happiness Report, based on the Gallup World Poll. Sadly, the UK dropped two places in the rankings to 19th, while the US rose by one place to 15th, and France fell out of the top 20.


Overall, the report paints quite a positive picture, and shows that people’s ‘life evaluations’ have been quite resilient. In fact, global averages of ‘happiness’ in the Covid years of 2020 to 2022 are as high as they were in the pre-pandemic years of 2017 to 2019.

Mike Robinson FCA, chief executive, British Safety Council: "In a world flooded with information and data, it is hard to see the wood for the trees, but surely something worth trying, if nothing else than for the sake of our own and others’ wellbeing."

However, the authors of the report stress that we should not just look at the average levels of happiness which result from a particular society, we should also look at the scale of ‘misery’, or low life satisfaction, to get the full picture.

This is a theme picked up in analysis of the latest Gallup World Poll, by an international group of academics, which showed that people around the world – of all ages, income, and education – are increasingly saying they are ‘emotionally distressed’.

By combining findings about worry, sadness, stress and anger into a single metric, they have created a global index of ‘emotional distress’, which shows a similar rise in all 113 countries.

From 2009 to 2021, the report shows that prevalence of feelings of distress increased a lot, by around 24 per cent. Fourteen years ago, one in four people reported experiences of distress. Two years ago, that had risen to one in three, or two billion adults. This was the case across demographic groups, though largest among more disadvantaged groups.

Crucially, the report found that distress levels rose during the pandemic in 2020, over and above the general increasing trend in distress. That said, for all groups wellbeing returned quite quickly to pre-pandemic levels.

So, what’s leading to this increase in emotional distress? The reality is we don’t know for sure.

Some people think it could be because we’re all a bit more willing to talk about our feelings. Others point to social media, and especially its impact on younger people’s mental health.

Even the academics who created the index are not certain, wondering if it is about broader trends around economic and political insecurity and social cohesion, or maybe down to declining trust in politicians.

Life expectancy has increased around the world – though we have also learned it was slower in the UK than other G7 countries in the past seven decades and is now falling.

Across the globe people are materially better off, and better educated than ever before. So, what is driving our increasing anxiety?

The Times, in a recent editorial, wanted to tell us the good news (for once) that: “the proportion of people living in extreme poverty has declined at its fastest rate in history over the past two decades. More than half the world’s population is middle class. Global deaths of children under five more than halved between 1990 and 2021.”

For more proof that the world is actually better than you think it is, try reading Factfulness by Swedish academic Hans Rosling, along with his son and daughter-in-law.

As the book’s publishers say: “When we worry about everything all the time instead of embracing a worldview based on facts, we can lose our ability to focus on the things that threaten us most.”

In a world flooded with information and data, it is hard to see the wood for the trees, but surely something worth trying, if nothing else than for the sake of our own and others’ wellbeing.

OPINION


Matthew Holder

Deregulation: time to change the story

By Matthew Holder, Unchecked UK on 01 May 2022

Regulations that ‘burden’, regulatory ‘barnacles’ and ‘red tape’. Just some of the words and phrases contained in a letter from Jacob Rees-Mogg that appeared in The Sun newspaper in 2022, calling on its readers to suggest UK regulations to abolish. Together they, with countless other examples, negatively frame how many politicians and commentators, amplified by a supportive media, see regulations – and enforcement – and how they would like the public to see them.



Wind Turbines iStock CharlieChesvick

Offshore wind turbines: managing the safety risks

By Bruce Craig, Pinsent Masons on 01 June 2022

As we strive to move from reliance on fossil fuels to renewable energy, one area of crucial importance will be wind power – both onshore and offshore. However, there are some important health and safety factors and risks that must be taken into account and carefully managed by those constructing, operating and maintaining offshore wind turbines and farms.



Andrew Pakes Prospect

A ‘Right to Disconnect’ would help protect workers’ mental health

By Andrew Pakes, Prospect on 01 June 2022

A universal presumption that work will be safe, or at least as safe as it can be, is one of the key achievements of the labour movement over the past century. Gone are the days of people crawling into moving machinery because it’s too costly to shut it down. But the new world of work brings its own challenges, and it is up to us as trade unions to ensure that the rights of workers keep up with those changes.