Getting the PPE selection process right leads to better wearer protection, cost savings and environmental benefits – but it’s essential to use a specialist provider with the expertise to guide you.
Features
Selecting PPE: suitability and sustainability are key
By
on 01 May 2023
The pandemic-induced mass demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) led to a worldwide scramble for sought-after global stocks, where control over spend was de-prioritised. In the aftermath of this, the focus seems to be firmly back on allocation – spend and control, with cost saving initiatives coming back to the fore. Along with this is a prioritisation of quality, sustainable and fit-for-purpose options, and specialist services and solutions like site surveys to properly assess requirements.
Photograph: iStock/maselkoo99
Organisations are keen to make the right product choices for their needs, minimise their carbon footprint and ensure the safety, wellbeing and comfort of their employees. The latest innovations, technologies and solutions emerging, as product innovation gets back on track following a lull, are helping them achieve this. And, contrary to common perception, choosing better quality or more sustainable options can actually create cost efficiencies rather than added cost.
Negating a one-size-fits-all approach... once and for all
It was perhaps difficult to be choosy in a scenario of low global PPE stocks, with a ‘take what you can get your hands on’ approach. But, even prior to the pandemic, many organisations would have been in the habit of buying high volumes of single-use products like gloves and masks in one, or limited, sizes. It may not seem too big an issue, but poorly fitting PPE can inadvertently cause the wearer to manually adjust the product for comfort. This is a natural human reaction, and one that can often happen without the wearer realising. In some cases, this could render the PPE ineffective.
Workwear that is ill-fitting will be too tempting to leave unzipped, rolled up or secured using products not included or approved with the specification, potentially exposing skin and/or causing excess material to become a trip or snag hazard. A mask that has not been correctly face-fit tested can cause leaks, and result in the wearer breathing in the very hazard that the mask was designed to protect them from.
Loose gloves can end up getting caught in machinery, or prevent the wearer from being able to hold their equipment safely, causing grip issues and increasing the risk of hand injury. Gloves that are too tight can affect dexterity, comfort and safety. These examples constitute just some of the many possible scenarios, and present issues to organisations including the safety and wellbeing of employees, contamination risk to production applications, compliance breaches and reduced work output, to name a few.
Ryan Plummer is senior director at RS Safety Solutions.
The emerging solutions and technologies to remedy this are now plentiful, and thanks to greater awareness, more accessible and more easily adopted. Better quality single-use gloves, some of which are manufactured or packaged in a more low-carbon way, present a more sustainable option for this consumable. A higher quality glove may present an initial higher cost, but when taking into consideration the fact it should last longer it can become cost comparable or even more cost efficient. Lower quality gloves may tear more easily and require more changes so ultimately prove more costly overall.
A growing focus on sustainability
There’s no doubt sustainability is becoming a huge consideration and priority as organisations focus on controlling spend and making the right PPE purchasing decisions. And rightly so, as single-use PPE has a significant impact on the environment. The issue is being tackled through the development of lower carbon manufacturing, packaging and transportation processes, use of innovative materials that are recycled or recyclable, and biodegradable options. Therefore, there’s no reason why sustainability can’t be a significant part of any PPE purchasing decision.
Taking gloves as a prime example of a single-use product that is a major landfill contributor, switching to a higher quality product to minimise wastage as a result of the product failing is a great start. But with options that can biodegrade by 90 per cent in 490 days, compared with a traditional nitrile glove which can be in the decomposition process for more than 100 years, organisations can go the extra mile to reduce their environmental impact.
Where processing environments call for strict hygiene standards, like food production, opting for alternatives to single-use aprons can make a real difference. Durable, reusable and washable options that still comply with food safety regulations, can help firms meet environmental goals and save money in the long run. Many of the available options can individually equal a saving of more than 200 disposable garments going into landfill. When used across a workforce, the savings in both money and waste are remarkable.
Specialist advice and services are real requirements
While organisations using PPE are focusing on spend and sustainability goals, knowing where to start and navigating what can be a minefield of products and information is a daunting task. Rather than buying from generic sources, there has been a notable requirement for specialist providers. PPE buyers aren’t just looking for a provider that can offer a wide variety of products for a range of sector needs, but also knowledge and expertise in the best products for the application, a strong understanding of regulations and compliance requirements and site survey services to help them understand their true needs.
Following a period of uncertainty around stock sourcing, firms are also increasingly looking for strong and reliable supply chains, as well as assurance that it is ethical (and verifiable) and they are not at risk of receiving fake, sub-standard or non-compliant goods. PPE isn’t simply a commodity which should be procured in bulk with price being an overriding factor, and thankfully, this is a much more widely recognised realisation.
As industry innovation has been kick-started and new products begin to flood the market, organisations with a PPE requirement should embrace the options available and commit to proper assessment of requirements and the close catering of them, for the good of employees, budget and planet.
Ryan Plummer is senior director at RS Safety Solutions. He has been involved in B2B distribution for more than 18 years, with experience of product and service solutions at the design, build and maintain phases of the asset lifecycle.
For more information on the PPE available from RS Safety Solutions see:
FEATURES
Drivers’ toilets: an inconvenient truth?
By Belinda Liversedge on 01 March 2022
It’s a sunny day on the road to Milan as Romanian driver, Cosman climbs up into his HGV. But it’s not the weather or the beautiful Italian scenery that’s stopping him from returning to work in the UK. “The conditions in the UK are the worst in Europe,” he says. “I am sorry to say it, but in Italy you don’t pay for showers or overnight parking. You can eat well for not much money.”
Time to report
By Dr Keith Whitehead on 01 April 2022
Some of the UK’s largest businesses and financial institutions must now report publicly on the risks and opportunities they face as a result of climate change.
Companies must start engaging with the circular economy. Those that don’t will lose out
By Belinda Liversedge on 01 June 2022
Mark Maslin is Professor of Earth System Science at University College London and author of How to Save Our Planet. He is also founder of Rezatec Ltd, which works with companies to offer AI ‘big data’ solutions to tackle environmental issues. Speaking to Belinda Liversedge in Glasgow during the COP26 climate summit, Mark shared his views on the process and why there’s still a lot organisations can do to save the planet and profit while they are at it, regardless of global action and commitment.