News

Working people should have say in AI, not just ‘tech bros and politicians’

By on

AI Safety Summit a ‘missed opportunity’ for worker safety, says open letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.


Workers most affected by AI have been marginalised by the AI Safety Summit taking place at Bletchley Park this week, according to a letter signed by trade unions, UK human rights organisations and the AI Council, the former independent expert committee which advised the government on AI strategy.

The letter says the event has invited a ‘select few corporations’ to shape the rules. “Your ‘Global Summit on AI Safety’ seeks to tackle the transformational risks and benefits of AI, [a technology that] will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, and relate to one another,” it says.

“Yet the communities and workers most affected by AI have been marginalised by the Summit. The involvement of civil society organisations that bring a diversity of expertise and perspectives has been selective and limited. This is a missed opportunity.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and others at AI Summit. Photograph: UK government / Flickr

The letter has been coordinated by the TUC, Connected by Data and Open Rights Group and was released for the official AI Summit at Bletchley Park on 1 and 2 November.

Among the 100 plus signatories are the Alan Turing Institute, Amnesty International, Consumers International, academics at the University of Cambridge, NASUWT, the teachers union and the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), representing 60 unions.

It follows concerns about threats to worker safety from AI which were shared last month by Lawrence Webb, President of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH).

Speaking at the annual conference of the Asian Pacific Occupational Safety and Health Organisation on 24 October, Webb spoke of AI’s ‘game-changing level of performance’, not just in terms of productivity but also in making workers safer.

But he thought there was a danger that organisations who lack the experience needed to make use of the emerging technologies will leave their people vulnerable in terms of their safety and health.

“Before we let our new digital capability run away with us, we must be aware of its threats to worker health and safety if it’s allowed to be adopted in the workplace unchecked and unregulated.

“We need to stop and build a constructive framework for the design, adoption and implementation of technologies with the potential to transform work and working lives.”

TUC Assistant General Secretary Kate Bell commented: “It shouldn’t just be tech bros and politicians who get to shape the future of AI.”

“It is hugely disappointing that unions and wider civil society have been denied proper representation at this Summit.

“AI is already making life-changing decisions – like how we work, how we’re hired and who gets fired. But working people have yet to be given a seat at the table.”

Read the open letter to the UK Prime Minister here

NEWS


Stressed And Insolvent MED Istock Credit Fizkes

Sick days highest for fifteen years, says CIPD with mental health ill cited as the main reason

By Belinda Liversedge on 11 September 2025

More concerted action is needed to tackle the main causes of stress at work, particularly high workloads, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has said, after its latest report showed sickness absence in the UK has soared to record highs.



Disabled Worker MED Istock Momcilog

DwP releases new funding to get 300,000 people with long term sickness or disability back into work

By Belinda Liversedge on 08 September 2025

One in four people in Britian who are not currently working cite sickness as a barrier, a figure which has more than doubled since 2012.



Smiley Faces Istock 1070828464

Workers report having to engage in ‘emotional labour’ to remain positive, finds study on emerging technologies

By Belinda Liversedge on 29 August 2025

Emerging technologies have the potential to fundamentally reshape the world of work. These technologies can enhance productivity and, in many sectors, improve occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes for workers. However, they may also introduce new risks that are difficult to anticipate and manage.