Opinion

Tread carefully when sharing personal health and safety data

By on

Preparing for, dealing with and responding to health and safety incidents requires health and safety professionals to juggle many balls.


These include keeping people safe, responding quickly to potential risks, maintaining legal privilege and responding to queries from the regulator and civil claims. At times, some interests can feel competing.

However, over recent years, there has been an increased awareness of the privacy rights of individuals. The pandemic brought into sharp relief the need to carefully balance privacy and health and safety rights. So, what takes priority?

Handling information relating to injuries and medical conditions

Accident reports, witness statements, CCTV (closed-circuit television) footage and details of training will all constitute the personal data of the individuals concerned. As such, the UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) – which applies post-Brexit – sets out the legal requirements which must be met when handling the information.

As information about individuals’ injuries will concern their physical and/or mental health, this will be ‘special category data’ for the purpose of UK data protection legislation. This means that additional safeguards need to be in place for the management of such information.

Laura Gillespie: "Accident reports, witness statements, CCTV (closed-circuit television) footage and details of training will all constitute the personal data of the individuals concerned."Laura Gillespie: "Accident reports, witness statements, CCTV (closed-circuit television) footage and details of training will all constitute the personal data of the individuals concerned."

Lawful basis for processing

When handling personal information, the ‘controller’ (that is, the company or organisation who decides what information to collect and why), must ensure that it has a lawful basis to hold the information. This includes where the processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation or where it is for the ‘legitimate interests’ of the controller or a third party – so long as it does not override the individual’s right to privacy.   

If the information concerned contains medical information about an individual, then an additional ground for processing must be met. This includes where it is necessary for the defence of a legal claim or to protect the vital interests of the data subject where they are not able to give consent.

Need for transparency

Hard wired into the privacy legislation is the need to be fair, lawful and transparent when handling people’s private information. Usually this is achieved through the publication of a ‘privacy notice’ wherein it is explained what information an organisation will hold about an individual and with whom it might be shared.

Can personal data be shared with regulators, insurers or the supply chain involved in an investigation?

While the utterance of ‘data protection act’ can often be used as a reason not to share information, it is not impossible to do so.

What it does require is that health and safety professionals take four key steps:

1: Identify whether there is a lawful basis to share the information with the party concerned

2: Consider whether the need for transparency has been satisfied

3: Only share what is necessary, and

4: Document the reasons for the decision. 

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has recently published a new Data Sharing Code of Practice, which aims to reassure when it is possible to lawfully share personal information and what steps should be out in place when doing so.

ICO Data Sharing Code of Practice: bit.ly/3yhvSo5

Laura Gillespie is a partner in Pinsent Masons’ Litigation and Regulatory Compliance team. She specialises in data privacy and cyber security matters. Contact her at: bit.ly/3krCCfS

OPINION


Happy Worker Wearing Helmet iStock miniseries

In these times, how can we be safe, well and happy?

By Mike Robinson FCA on 01 July 2024

Last month, I mentioned two big moments – the General Election and the 50th anniversary of the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) on 31 July. The lack of attention given to health, safety, or even wellbeing by most political parties in their election manifestos, while not entirely unexpected, was disappointing. And it doesn’t reflect the real concerns of workers and leaders here and around the world.



Building with Cladding iStock richardwatson

It’s time to protect all leaseholders from ruinous building safety remediation costs

By The Earl of Lytton on 28 June 2024

In my previous piece for Safety Management last summer (‘A new Building Safety Remediation Scheme would hold developers and builders to account for all fire and building safety defects in homes’) I set the scene on the unfolding world of building safety remediation and described how I was attempting to change things in the interests of consumer safety. Now with a general election called, there is an opportunity to influence the policies of a new, incoming administration.



Menopause iStock Mohamed Faizal Bin Ramli

Menopause at work: government failing to grasp benefits of providing more support to women workers

By Caroline Nokes on 01 May 2023

Many employers are waking up to the realities of menopause, and the benefits of providing a supportive environment for women at work. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) research shows that 30 per cent of UK employers now have menopause policies, up from 10 per cent in 2019. But I am increasingly worried that the government has not appreciated the need to seize momentum.