Recent world events have brought home just how lucky we are if we can expect to stay safe. Fortunately, most of us do not live in places like Gaza or Ukraine. But conflicts like these can spill over, with their ripples felt worldwide, not to mention the risks of nuclear escalation.
Opinion
Should we feel more excited or scared about AI? Or both!
By
on 07 November 2023
The world as we have known it for 50 years no longer feels as certain, but uncertainty has always been the only thing we can rely on.
The same could be said of technological change. Combine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) with modern-day weaponry and we could quickly find ourselves in a very dangerous and unpredictable situation which is very difficult to control.
The day-to-day risks AI poses to all of us also won’t be restricted to a few geographical hotspots. The truth is, AI has the potential to upend everything, everywhere and forever.
Mike Robinson: "Guardrails are needed, but so is detailed, thoughtful regulation which sets out how AI should work in practice in the real world."
We’ve heard a lot about the threat of both automation and technology to jobs – after all, it’s a fear that has been with us since industrialisation. Thus far, however, while the nature of the work has changed, job numbers have continued to grow. But could AI be different? This technology could in theory not just replace us but take charge of our lives.
And there are other even more insidious and all-pervasive risks from AI and other online technologies which we are just beginning to face up to and attempt to control.
The Online Safety Act became law at the end of October, following years of debate and delay. It enters the statute book nearly two decades after smart phones and social media began to pose a risk to the safety of children, or vulnerable adults, and a full six years since the tragic death of Molly Russell.
Molly died, aged 14, having spent at least a year of her life digesting content about suicide, self-harm, and depression. Speaking at the time of the inquest, Molly’s father Ian said: “It’s a world I don’t recognise. It’s a ghetto of the online world that once you fall into it, the algorithm means you can’t escape it and it keeps recommending more content.”
Are we in danger of falling into a similar trap with AI? Are we destined to be ruled and enslaved by its ability to predict and shape what we think, want, and even feel?
For the first time, the new UK Online Safety Act puts the onus on online content providers and social media companies to prevent and remove illegal content as well as ensure children can’t access pornography or material which promotes self-harm, bullying or eating disorders. This should be welcomed by anyone who believes in people’s right to live free from harm, especially children.
Currently, however, no such legislation or regulations exist around the development of new forms of AI. It’s why the summit being held this month in the UK is important, as is the new AI Safety Institute, which the Prime Minister has announced.
In our sector, AI is starting to transform the way we do risk assessments, it could identify and spot hazards, and even predict and stop incidents before they occur. AI can also be used to replace humans in highly dangerous or hazardous environments, with robots, drones or other machines. All of which could be extremely beneficial.
But it also poses new challenges. AI can reinforce biases and prejudices, which could lead to bad health and safety judgements – exaggerating some risks, downplaying others or even missing them altogether. People will still need to work alongside AI-controlled machinery, and we must make sure they remain in charge of the machines, not the other way around!
Guardrails are needed, but so is detailed, thoughtful regulation which sets out how AI should work in practice in the real world. Otherwise, we could be sleepwalking into a very unpredictable and unpleasant future.
Mike Robinson FCA is chief executive of the British Safety Council
OPINION
In these times, how can we be safe, well and happy?
By Mike Robinson FCA on 01 July 2024
Last month, I mentioned two big moments – the General Election and the 50th anniversary of the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) on 31 July. The lack of attention given to health, safety, or even wellbeing by most political parties in their election manifestos, while not entirely unexpected, was disappointing. And it doesn’t reflect the real concerns of workers and leaders here and around the world.
It’s time to protect all leaseholders from ruinous building safety remediation costs
By The Earl of Lytton on 28 June 2024
In my previous piece for Safety Management last summer (‘A new Building Safety Remediation Scheme would hold developers and builders to account for all fire and building safety defects in homes’) I set the scene on the unfolding world of building safety remediation and described how I was attempting to change things in the interests of consumer safety. Now with a general election called, there is an opportunity to influence the policies of a new, incoming administration.
Menopause at work: government failing to grasp benefits of providing more support to women workers
By Caroline Nokes on 01 May 2023
Many employers are waking up to the realities of menopause, and the benefits of providing a supportive environment for women at work. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) research shows that 30 per cent of UK employers now have menopause policies, up from 10 per cent in 2019. But I am increasingly worried that the government has not appreciated the need to seize momentum.